Which logitech squeezebox to buy

In order to access MySqueezebox. Get more out of your Squeezebox. My Music. Exploring Squeezebox Apps. Click the App Gallery link above, find an app you like and choose the Install option to add it to your Squeezebox. At this time I have the SBTouch connected to my stereo which has multiple speakers in various rooms in the house. I have Booms in the dining room and next to my bed for evening listening. I have a SBRadio in the bathroom, kitchen, basement, and hidden in living room. This entire system can be synced if desired to provide complete audio everywhere.

I have enjoyed that for many many years but ,as it stands, it would be lost with UE. Respectfuly and Thank you. This is sad. And now Logitech is giving up Squeezebox completely. This is so sad. Good bye, good luck and thanks for all the fish. This is a sad sad day. An open system is closed. Audiophile quality is sacrificed. I suspect my substancial investment in Squeezeboxes Three Touches, two Squeezebox 2s, one Boombox, and one Radio, not to mention supporting my family with one Duet, one Squeezebox 2 and one Radio will in the not too distant future, sound as good as a brick.

My current Squeezebox setup which enables audiophile quality throughout my house, on my local network, of my lossless audio files, will slowly degrade to non-operability in a couple of years, as computer OSs upgrade and Squeezebox support diminishes for devices as well as software for smart phones and tablets ; leading to incompatibility.

If only you got your marketing ducks in a row, and marketed Squeezebox with any degree of commitment, you could have made a nice chunk of change and taken a substancial portion of the market.

With the ability to stream the files and optionally use the DAC or bypass to your own DAC, there are just not a lot of competitors out there if any. Particularly the possibility of third party remote apps for mobile devices gives one of the best user experiences in controlling your SB devices and server.

With the Touch it was a mistake to have the screen on the device and not on a remote. Sell it to somebody who sees the value. Open source the server software so we can keep getting upgrades and support for new servers.

As many others that have posted it is disappointing to see what is happening. I truly believe that this market has incredible potential and it was simply not marketed correctly. Having kept a simplified platform for the non techi and the current one for the feature rich IMHO could have done it, but that is only my opinion.

For the valued customer and ongoing support I have doubts. An these doubts are already materializing. As I plan to keep my Booms and duets up and working Logitech needs to do their part. It has been said for a long time the iphone application always needs to have the user enter mysqueexbox and PW when the application is opened.

This is a major pain and it is not necessary. I as others have mentioned it and nothing happened. I truly wish this gets fixed as the day the server goes online the app will probably no longer work. And now on top of all the iphone app is not working correctly with IOS 6 and there seems to be no rush to fix it. These are all symptoms of a company abandoning a product. I sure hope it is only an impression. Thanks for the clarification.

I own 4 duets, 2 booms, and 2 radios. I have often thought that the Squeezebox ecosystem is one of its greatest strengths.

Its other strength has been its unique architecture where one central server in the house can sync all players selectively while also integrating other music services — I love it! I have also thought that sales must have been hurt by the complexity imposed by that architecture I love it — but many may have found setup to be difficult — I assume that was the need to come out with something that was simpler.

All that being said, I think it is unfortunate that rather than make the existing architecture simpler to new users I know you tried already and throw in a decent mobile app I had to buy a 3rd party app to get a decent SB controller on my phone , a whole new system had to be created. Since the new architecture path has clearly been committed to at this point, may I suggest this as an option for you to look into: instead of make the UE line completely separate from SB, why not leave it as is but add one extra feature to it — allow the devices to be a SB end point.

In other words, once it is setup on the home network using whatever existing UE specific interface you have to set up the network , it does a network scan for a SB server and registers itself with that server… if a SB server exists. That way you could sell the gear to SB users like me who are way to invested in SB to ever move over to UE — plus I like the SB architecture better — it works better for people with large music selections.

This way you can make more money I would seriously consider buying the gear , and make SB users feel better that we still matter. In this scenario, the best Logitech can do is sell these user computer speakers which I assume is a lower margin deal for Logitech.

I am not sure if the UE hardware precludes this option, but it seems to me, assuming its doable on the hardware, that there is a money making opportunity here for Logitech where they also keep the SB community pro Logitech. Well Ariel, I find it very positive that we Squeezbox owners finaly found a voice within Logitech. During the coarse of the years it has always felt as we were talking aginst the walls. No one at Logitech seemed to be listening to us, your customers.

The only source where we got some answers was the at the unofficial Slimdevices forum. As a long time user I can only echo what many people have said here. Logitech made a huge mistake by dumping Squeezebox. In my homble optionion, there were other ways to turn around the Squeezebox product to make it appealing to the larger masses.

It basicaly all comes down to the lack of respect Logitech has shown to the Squeezebox products. In all honesty, I have asked myself many times why did Logitech bought Slimdevices in the first place. Ever since Logitech took over the product it went downhill with Squeezebox. This is very said at least.

Squeezebox had the oportunity to be a market leading product if only Logitech had put in the effort. I hope you can shed some light on the above. I hope that day never comes but if it does I sure hope there is an alternative on the market. At present, there is no decent alternative to Squeezebox. Shame on you Logitech!

One can understand why Logitech are pursuing a mass market solution with the UE radio path. Sadly it makes little sense to me as playback of local music is my primary source, with internet-based radio very much a secondary albeit useful add-on. Having a reliance on remote server is a bad idea in my view for that purpose, and removes a lot of functionality in the name of simplicity. This product is not targeted at the same users as the Squeezebox family, and much as we love it Audiophiles like me are not a significant customer group to Logitech.

What a shame — I have bought four Squeezeboxes and two Squeezebox Booms, which is quite a spend. In any case, I would most humbly request that Logitech open sources their proprietary components so that others can development going. Hooked up to a decent amp and speakers the SBT was everything I wanted, Great interface, fast, ease of use, looks — everything was perfect for me.

Reading the hi-fi forums many other industry experts would agree too. Without a product that connects to my high-end stereo, I will have to look elsewhere to continue my musical pleasure.

Especially if my favorite streaming services fail to continue to perform e. Sadly, hi-fi fans would love an even better SBTouch like product…and would spend more…if only it were offered.

But why does this exclude further development of the squeezebox line up? They are not mutually exclusive and are not attractive to the same customers ,but they share a common hardware and software platform?

As I see it you could get 2 for 1 one here. There is really no other options yet for a typical squeezebox power user ,you had this niche for yourself ,no competition at all and I still thinks you missed the majority of possible customers due to mismanagement of the product historically.

My main use of the players has always been for playing my own music collection with internet radio secondary. It was a brilliant and unique product that literally had no direct competitors. I find it hard to understand how Logitech expected a marketing success when they put so little effort into advertising. It remains a mystery to those of us looking in from the outside.

I wish Logitech well with their new UE Radio. Please think again and work out a way that means we do not loose any functionality but still move forward — why loose such a hardcore base? Seriously flawed decision!! Please count me as another Squeezebox fan that would implore Logitech to continue to maintain mysqueezebox. I expect the Slimdevices buyout and then epic fail by Logitech will make a good case study at business school of corporate bungling.

One simple comment: it is important, when developing your product line, to recognize the hifi cllients who have Duets and Touchs I have both as well as the more casual listeners who have Booms or Radios have them too. We tend to infuence many buyers and often guide folks to products that we find outstanding. Squeezebox was that. Otherwise, I will have to recommend Apple products as they are both easy to use and are able to do hifi.

As an e-user, I am very disappoint with the decision your company have made. On the another hand, It is really hard to find any else productions made by Logitech can not be replaced with other brand. I appreciate you are finally addressing the Squeezebox customers. What I do not appreciate is that the responses to the open letter are getting censured.

I really would like your response to an earlier post I made that did not make it through the website. I believe that as customers who have been faithful to Logitech you owe us at least that. I agree with Jazzbert on the HiFi issue. Even though my home setup is not the epitome of HiFi, it does pretty well. I simply use the analogue line out to an old NAD receiver and it sounds fabulous, but knowing I could get crazy with external DACs etc makes it a pretty sweet unit.

The headphone jack on the Touch is also fairly impressive, and considerably better than the SB Radio. The Radio desperately needs a dedicated line out of some description. That is the one major beef I have — even the headphone jack on my cell phone sounds better.

I sincerely hope this will not be the end of Squeezebox. I must have talked at least 10 friends into buying into squeezebox and using also it with squeezebox server running on a nas. I do not do music streaming fomr the internet, only high quality FLAC from my server as do my friends.

I still have the SlimP3 it is now the heart of my music system in my mobile home , a classic, a radio and 2 touches. So from me an my friends too, please keep it up and running. At least keep the Touch, it is brilliant for us music lovers. I want to keep Apple out of the door in this respect. I like many others here feel that Logitech has completely lost the plot dropping the Squeezebox range.

I recently wrote an article in the September Linux Journal praising how forward thinking Logitech was with the Squeezebox acquisition, and encouraged folks to try it out and get to know the platform better. Unfortunately, this decision to cancel the Squeezebox platform in favor of the UE platform calls a lot of the advantages I extolled in the article to question, namely the third-party software support, the openness of the platform, and the amazing backward compatibility.

Making it a lame duck system only adds confusion to an already confused market. And make no mistake: the UE Smart Radio is a confused duck. Regardless, I still stand by what I wrote, because at the time it was true: Logitech was forward thinking by keeping the Squeezebox open, and made a compelling argument for folks like me to pick up other Squeezebox devices, and tell their friends.

I hope those words once again ring true. I have used the Squeezebox products over the past few years, and also been a keen observer of the how the market for streaming or at least use of digital music files has been developing.

It seems to me that the introduction of the UE radio is a clear pointer to the road Logitech has decided to follow. One of the key things you notice about Squeezebox and Sonos customers is that once they buy one device, they often come back for a second, third, fourth etc. They also have a tendancy to recommend these products to others.

There is a great opportunity in the market for a system that offers a flexible,affordable multiroom system that provides better sound quality than the Sonos system. Oh Logitech, Logitech, You are leaving us all out in the cold. You had a strong, loyal, first mover, influencing client base and you dumped us. You just lost both customer groups. Big Mistake. Sorry to see you go. You dump us, we stop supporting you.

I will never buy another logitech product again. I have 2 touch and 7 radio. In the morning, they nicely wake me up for 2 years with a random album of my own local collection.

Why is it so hard to understand that upgrading only the radio to UE is not an option since it would simply break my multiroom setup? As an owner of a Transporter, a couple of Duets, and a Boom, I am one very sad dude.

And as anyone with sales background knows, when you lose one customer, you really lose 10 others too.

I got a lot of people psyched on this technology — all for nothing. This is a classic case of management that got too far removed from their customers. Think how hard their salespeople must have worked to build that base, which as a previous poster here pointed out is as strong as the Apple die-hards in some quarters. Logitech had the chance to build on what the essence of what made this product line special, and instead, decided to trash it and replace it through downgrading.

So, rather than double-down and fix the problems, modernize the interface and technology, expand on what made the product unique, thereby making it unassailable, they simply chose to walk away. Unfortunately, they forgot that we are thousands of SB advanced users still in that boat, and that we will sink with the boat… unless some rescue boat comes close… Oh, i see the Sonos ship coming close.

So Long stupid. Like most others commenting I am very unhappy with Logitechs decision to discontinue the Squeezebox platform. I have only been a fan for less than two years but already have 3 Radios and 2 Touches — if I had known the fate of the platform earlier I would not have gone near it!! Logitech had a unique product with much future potential and just blew it — and for what? I would have bought into Squeezebox much earlier — had I known it existed — do you not have a marketing dept??!!

Imagine if Apple had developed and marketed Squeezebox — the Radio and the Touch would cost twice as much as now — BUT they would be in every home!! You really do not have any idea what you have just given away — a great product range and a loyal customer base, gone for nothing.

Anyway, that is my view — now for my question: as you must be aware the Squeezebox Controller App no longer works under iOS6. I have contacted your Customer Service who have no idea when or even if this will ever be updated now the platform is discontinued. Can you say if a fix is planned or will this be the first part of the Squeezebox platform to disappear?

I feel compelled to voice my regret that Logitech is eliminating the Squeezebox line, particularly the Touch. I visited the forums to get the system set up, and the system worked perfectly for me.

I would occasionally visit the forums to perform an upgrade, but for the most part the system worked great for me — it did everything I needed, and I was extremely happy. I can be categorized as an influencer among my friends and I have helped more than a few of them setup their own Squeezebox systems.

When the Touch was introduced I remember reading about it on the Logitech site, but quite frankly the copy used on the site did not do a good job at articulating the features and value of the product. I learned of the demise of the Squeezebox line because of a random visit to the forums.

As a result, in the last two weeks I bought two Touches. I would have bought these long ago had I known how great they were. How did you not get to me sooner? I am your target customer and you failed to reach me. My biggest concern is that Logitech appears to have a policy of offering no support for out of warranty products. Basically, if something fails after the warranty period, the purchaser is expected to throw it away. I would personally be willing to pay to repair the two SB3s that are currently sitting on my shelf.

I suspect that the fix for one is almost trivial as it would involve replacement of the network component. The fix for the other is probably less obvious as the unit restarts itself after playing a song for seconds. As it is I will continue to buy used units on e-bay as they become available to have spares for the future and to provide for friends and family interested in having them. I would not buy a system that did not let me play back local content. I would not buy a system that depends on remote servers.

If you cut them off and you will, someday , the hardware will be junk. I bought into the SB system because I could integrate and automate with it. I would just use my iPad and AirPlay in the future. Ariel: Are there any plans for providing a Touch-like device for customers to use with their stereo systems? And, any plans for a speaker Boom?

The Transporter was cool also just out of my price range. I guess the biggest issue is that I now have such a substantial monetary investment in the squeezebox platform Duet, 2 add on receivers, Boom, Radio.

Now I feel bad leading people down this road that I believed in so strongly. IMHO a big mistake to kill the SB line, unless, of course, there is a buyer in the wings that is going to continue the product line. Anyone have any suggestions on an alternative product? Must have an ethernet connection wireless at a pinch for connection to my NAS which holds all of my media. Ariel, Thanks for being responsive and having taken the time to send this open letter. The quality of the SBT connected to my stereo is superb at the price it was sold.

Are you pulling back from that high quality SBT market? Now it seems that you are pulling out of this segment and that you are not securing your relationships with your customers in this segment of the market. I think that may provide clarity for many of your SBT customers who can then probably still be loyal customers going forward.

Hello, This is terrible. I also want SB Touch two in near future. These are excelent pieces of hardware. I believe that the road you have chosen is bad. You will loose clients considering myself. As a very satisfied SB Touch user, I am very disappointed too. For sure, Logitech will only support this products for a limited time. Your promises are worthless in the near future. The password reset code has been sent to your Email. An error has occurred. Please check your e-mail address and try again.

Forgot your Password? Name is empty First Name. Wrong Email Address Email. You have not written a message send. Your message has been sent! Cancel Close. Show more close.